|
Legal Comment by Mark Illidge of Hinterland
Lawyers
August 2004
If you operate a Trust, or are considering using one, you
may wish to consider the extent of your liability.
A Trust, in law, is not a separate entity to the
Trustee. A Trust can be described as the relationship that exists between
the Trustee, who holds the legal ownership of the Trust property, and the
beneficiaries, who hold the beneficial ownership of the Trust
property. The Trustee and the Trust are therefore one and the same
entity and, where the Trustee is an individual, the Trustee is personally liable
for all Trust debts.
For example, Jack owns property in his personal capacity
worth $500,000 and is also personally the Trustee of his Family Trust that
conducts the family business. The Family Trust has assets to the value of
$300,000. A creditor of the business successfully sues the business for
the sum of $400,000. Jack is personally liable as Trustee to satisfy the
creditors claim and is obliged to pay the $400,000. By virtue of his right
of indemnity against the Trust assets, Jack recovers the $300,000 from the Trust
assets. Jack would personally have to carry the loss of $100,000 being the
difference between the Trust assets and the claim.
The most common option to overcome this is to have a $2
shelf company act as Trustee with the sole director of that Trustee company
being an individual with minimal assets.
Generally, a Trustee may be removed and replaced by new
Trustee without any stamp duty or tax implications.
The point of the matter is that the Trustee should own
minimal assets in its own right.
To find out more about the authors you can read About Us
For more information or to make an appointment please Contact Us
|